Sunday, May 11, 2014

THIRD ANNUAL BVR/SPU VALUATION CHALLENGE: SEATTLE ROUND PRESENTERS AND FACULTY

My congratulations and thanks to my academic colleagues and to the team members who were selected for the final round of the BVR/SPU Valuation Challenge this year.  It was a privilege and a joy to work with you.  Here you are listed by university affiliation:

Middle Tennessee State University 

Presenters:

Nick Ferran,
Jack Coleman,
Nathan Jones
Blake Allen

Faculty:  Charles Beauchamp


Portland State University

Presenters:

Chris Park-Williams
Michael Bush
Khalid Alanazi
Shreya Goyal
Matt Jin
Cortny Bourbonnais

Faculty:  Janet Hamilton


Seattle Pacific University

Presenters:

Michael Brooks
Cody Dutton
Marco Price
David Zazzi

Faculty:  Herbert Kierulff


University of Denver

Presenters:

Jordyn Michaud
Suyun Gu
Ryan Stine
Daniel OLaughlin
Paul Diegnau
Douglas Brothers

Faculty:  Keith Sellers and Jeff Brothers


University of Maryland (University College)

Presenter:  Roman Morey 

Faculty:  William Marcoux, Jr.


William Paterson University

Presenters:

Elvis Pinos
Chris Vartanian
Michael Cerone
Osiris Mason
Sonia Morales
Sholpan Nugmanova

Faculty:  Peter Caiazzo

Saturday, May 10, 2014

THIRD ANNUAL BVR/SPU VALUATION CHALLENGE: MAY 9, 2014

Student teams from 18 universities entered the Third Annual BVR/SPU Valuation Challenge.  Six teams were chosen to come to Seattle by a distinguished panel of 17 judges who hold senior positions in their valuation firms.  The 2014 Challenge winners are:  University of Denver followed by Portland State University and Seattle Pacific University in that order.  Middle Tennessee State University, University of Maryland (University College), and William Paterson University provided strong competition.  Congratulations to all!  The list of participants and their professors will follow in a subsequent blog.

We used an eight question survey to evaluate the Challenge.  Questions 4 and 5 in the survey summarized the experience.   Question 4 ("My overall experience with today's competition") asked for a ranking using a range of 5 to 1, where 5 was excellent and 1 was poor,  and it asked for comments.  Question 5  ("Do you believe the Valuation Challenge experience will be worth the time and effort you put into it?") asked the respondents to circle one of the following:  definitely yes, yes, maybe, no, and definitely no.  Comments were also requested.

All three judges gave question 4 an excellent (5) rating and all circled "definitely yes" for question 5.  Among other comments was the following:  "It was an awesome experience to see everything the students learned."

Four faculty members filled out the survey; the fifth was unable to attend the competition due to illness.  I organized the event, so I did not participate.  Two faculty members rated the Challege as excellent on question 4.  The other two faculty members did not provide a number rating on that question.  The first of the two simply commented "Amazing" and the second commented:  "Very positive.  The judges did a good job of explaning how to conduct non-classroom presentations."  All four faculty members circled "definitely yes" on question 5.

Twenty-five of the 27 student participants returned the survey.  On question 4, 13 checked 5,  and six marked 4.  Six did not record a number; here are the initial comments of those six:  "Very good";  "It was great"; "I had a very good experience"; "Good flow, lots of fun, overall very good"; "I love this, learned so much"; and "I really enjoyed being part of this event, and it's such a great experience...".

On question 5, 21 of the students circled "definitely yes".  Four circled "yes"—they believed that the Valuation Challenge experience will be worth the time and effort they put into it.

Thanks to the judges for their great work.  Willis Eayrs, Independent Valuation Consultant and Deputy Chairman of the International Association of Consultants, Valuators, and Analysts (IACVA) brought an international perspective to the judging.  Joseph Maas, Founder and Principal of  Synergetic Finance, not only judged but also contributed the Joseph Maas $1,500 Award, the opportunity to use the magnificent Columbia Tower Club for the event, his new book Exit Insight: Getting to Sold, and the all-day beverage service.  Miranda Rickert, Senior Financial Analyst, represented Moss Adams, the firm that provided the valuation report we used as the case.  

William Hanlin, Jr, President & CEO of IACVA spent most of the day as a consultant to the judges and partcipants.  Marek Omilian, Managing Director of Value Prism Consulting, dropped in as observer and consulting judge.

We also welcomed Joseph Marasco and Adam Manson of Business Valuation Resources (BVR).  It was Manson's offer of access to BVR materials, the assistance of the two in finding judges and gaining Moss Adams' support, and BVR's financial contribution that made the Challenge possible.

A special thank you to Grant Learned, Attorney at Law, who recorded the day's events on camera and video recorder and to Mark Sabo, Principal of Financial Horizons, who monitored the presenters' slides and kept the presentations on time.  I wish to express my gratitude to Kathy Stegman at SPU for all her significant support and assistance and my thanks to Dean Joseph Williams for his encouragement.


Monday, October 14, 2013

BVR/SPU Valuation Challenge Update

Over the past two weeks four more universities have joined the 2014 Valuation Challenge.  Only six more opportunities to participate remain.  Here are the 18 current entrants:


Anderson University
California State University, Northridge
City University of New York (CUNY)
Friends University
Harding University
Middle Tennessee State University
Ohio Wesleyan University
Pacific Lutheran University
Portland State University
Salisbury University
San Francisco State University
Seattle Pacific University
University of Denver
University of North Florida
University of Oregon
University of Tennessee
Wesleyan University
William Paterson University

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

The Valuation Challenge 2014 Guidelines

Here are the guidelines for valuing the 2014 Valuation Challenge Case, ABC Engineering:

Governing Standard:  Revenue Ruling 59-60

Purpose:  Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust valuation for administrative purposes and stock transactions

Standard of Value:  Fair Market Value

Premise of Value:  Value as a going concern

Client Name:  Trustees of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan

Business Name:  ABC Engineering, Inc.

Type of Entity:  S Corporation

State of Incorporation:  Washington, USA

Principal Business Location:  Somewhere, USA

Business Interest Valued:  20%

Valuation Date:  December 31, 2012

Report Date:  May 9, 2014

Appraiser Name:  School of Business Team

Appraiser Firm:  University

Characteristics of Ownership:  Non-controlling (minority)

Minority Discount:  Include

Marketability Discount:  Include